This article describes special features of using computer technologies in psychodiagnostics. There is a description of native and foreign researches, in which the results of paper and computer versions of different testing methods were compared. Some specific factors in computer diagnostics which are necessary to consider while organizing and holding testing are reviewed. Computer diagnostic program greatly facilitates the process of testing and subsequent processing response test. Such advantage as instant calculation of results saves researcher`s time and gives opportunity to represent results of test to probationer very soon. Empirical research held by researchers of Urban Resource Center of Giftedness at the MSUPE(head Jurkiewicz V.S.), described in the article, represents comparison data of the results, received by 2 variants of methodical diagnosis of intellectual abilities «Standard Progressive Matrices Plus Raven» (classical and paper version) in one of pupil groups. Special factors in holding computer version of this method which are necessary to be noticed by a researcher for getting true results of diagnosis are analyzed.
Keywords: computer psychodiagnostics, intellectual abilities, Standard Progressive Matrices Plus Raven, gifted pupils
Epachintseva G.A. K probleme komp'yuternoi diagnostiki v obrazovanii [On
the problem of computer diagnostics in education]. Vestnik OGU [OSU
messenger], 2005, no. 4, pp. 170–173.
Ivanov S.V. Informatsionno-izmeritel'nye aspekty psikhologicheskogo
testirovaniya na komp'yutere [Information-measuring aspects of psychological
testing on the computer]. Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo
pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gercena [Russian State
Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen news], 2008, no. 69, pp.
Raven Dzh.K., Kort Dzh.Kh., Raven Dzh. Rukovodstvo k Progressivnym
Matritsam Ravena i Slovarnym Shkalam: Razdel 3: Standartnye Progressivnye
Matritsy (vklyuchaya parallel'nye i plyus versii) [A Guide to the Raven's
Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales: Section 3: The Standard Progressive
Matrices (including parallel and plus version)] Moscow: «Cogito-Centr», 2002.
Solov'eva D.V. Komp'yuternye tekhnologii dlya psikhologa [Computer
technology for the psychologist]. Shkol'nyi psiholog [The school
psychologist], 2009, no. 24, pp. 8–10.
Chervinskaya K.R. Komp'yuternaya psikhodiagnostika [Computer
psychodiagnosis]. Saint Petersburg: Rech', 2003. 336 p.
Piaw C.Y. Effects of computer-based testing on test performance and
testing motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012. Vol. 28, pp.
1580–1586. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.020.
Piaw C.Y. Establishing a Brain Styles Test: The YBRAINS Test.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011. Vol. 15, pp.
Piaw C.Y. Replacing paper-based testing with computer-based testing
in assessment: Are we doing wrong? Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 2012. Vol. 64, pp. 655–664. doi: 10.1016/
Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. MCB University
Press, 2001. Vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1–6.